Automation in Aircraft Systems
Automation
Over the past few decades, automation has transcended
its initial applications in manufacturing and extended its reach into sectors
like healthcare, transportation, and agriculture. Robotics and autonomy have
taken center stage in the development of automated and semi-automated systems,
sparking concerns about the replacement of humans in the workforce and the
symbiotic relationship between humans and machines in achieving shared
objectives. Yet, the extensive use of autonomous functions in both crewed and
uncrewed aircraft raises concerns about human operators' reliance on these
systems. This dependency often leads to limited understanding of the system
functions and reduced control over intervention points for human operators
during certain processes.
Levels of Autonomy
Autonomy characterizes a system's capability to act,
function, or decide independently or with limited external influence, embodying
self-governance and self-control. It enables entities to function without
direct human intervention, adhering to predefined instructions or making
decisions based on acquired patterns, rules, or algorithms. In the context of
UAS operations, the spectrum of automation spans from level 0 to level 9,
where level 9 signifies complete autonomy.
Level 0: The computer offers no assistance; the human
operator is solely responsible for all actions and decision-making.
Level 1: The computer presents a complete set of
action alternatives for the human operator.
Level 2: The computer narrows down the action
alternatives to a few choices for the human operator.
Level 3: The computer suggests a single action,
awaiting approval from the human operator.
Level 4: The computer executes the suggested action
only after receiving approval from the human operator.
Level 5: The computer gives the human operator a
restricted time frame to veto an action before automatic execution.
Level 6: The computer executes an action automatically
and informs the human operator about it.
Level 7: The computer informs the human operator about
an executed action only if the operator requests the information.
Level 8: The computer informs the human operator about
an executed action if it decides to do so after execution.
Level 9: The computer makes all decisions and acts autonomously, disregarding the human operator completely.
The illustration below showcases levels of automation
related to drone application, as categorized by Cloud Factory.
Levels of Drone Automation, Courtesy of CloudFactory,
2023
The utilization of autonomy in aviation
Presently, autonomy in aircraft has evolved
significantly compared to its early introduction decades ago. In the past,
there were tragic accidents in general aviation, such as the crash of Eastern
Air Lines Flight 401 in the Everglades, Florida, attributed to poor
comprehension of these systems and excessive reliance on autonomous functions.
Despite advancements made by aircraft manufacturers in automation, the Boeing
737 Max passenger jet crash in 2018 resulted in over 350 fatalities. This
catastrophe was linked to the design of the Maneuvering Characteristics
Augmentation System (MCAS), intended to enhance aircraft handling and reduce
pitch-up tendencies at high angles of attack. Reflecting on various accidents
involving systems interfacing with autonomy or having control, it seems the
aviation industry has aggressively implemented ambitious systems that could
have benefited from more extended testing before integration into aircraft
carrying hundreds of passengers.
Comments
Post a Comment